Webcrawler API LogoWebCrawler API
PricingDocsBlogSign inSign Up
Webcrawler API LogoWebCrawler API

Tools

  • Website to Markdown
  • llms.txt Generator
  • HTML to Readability

Resources

  • Blog
  • Docs
  • Changelog

Follow us

  • Github
  • X (Twitter)
  • Postman
  • Swagger

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Refund Policy

Made in Netherlands 🇳🇱
2023-2026   ©103Labs
    ComparisonJSONCSVRAG

    JSON vs CSV: Choosing the Right Format for LLM Prompts

    JSON vs CSV for scraped datasets and LLM prompt outputs: structure, nesting, parsing, and what works best for pipelines and RAG.

    Written byAndrew
    Published onFeb 1, 2026

    Table of Contents

    • Quick comparison
    • What JSON is good at
    • What CSV is good at
    • Use cases in web crawling, scraping, and RAG
    • When JSON should be used
    • When CSV should be used
    • Practical tradeoffs
    • CSV forces decisions early
    • JSON makes "optional" fields easy
    • Node.js snippet: Flatten JSON records for CSV export
    • Conclusion

    Table of Contents

    • Quick comparison
    • What JSON is good at
    • What CSV is good at
    • Use cases in web crawling, scraping, and RAG
    • When JSON should be used
    • When CSV should be used
    • Practical tradeoffs
    • CSV forces decisions early
    • JSON makes "optional" fields easy
    • Node.js snippet: Flatten JSON records for CSV export
    • Conclusion

    JSON and CSV are both used for structured outputs, but different data shapes are assumed. JSON is used for objects and nested structures. CSV is used for flat rows.

    A broader overview is covered in Best Prompt Data.

    Quick comparison

    TopicJSONCSV
    Best forNested objects, metadata, APIsFlat tables and exports
    Parsing reliabilityHighHigh (with correct quoting)
    Human editingMediumMedium to High (spreadsheets)
    Nested dataSupportedNot supported
    Common failureSchema driftCommas/quotes/newlines in cells

    What JSON is good at

    JSON is usually selected when:

    • Each record contains nested fields (offers, variants, breadcrumbs)
    • Metadata is required for RAG (url, section, chunk_id)
    • Validation and type checking are needed

    JSON paired with readable docs is covered in Markdown vs JSON.

    What CSV is good at

    CSV is usually selected when:

    • A table is desired (one row per page/product)
    • Data must be used in spreadsheets
    • Simple imports are planned

    If the data is not tabular, CSV is often the wrong tool. Plain narrative output is covered in CSV vs Plain Text.

    Use cases in web crawling, scraping, and RAG

    When JSON should be used

    JSON is usually preferred when:

    • Crawled pages produce different optional fields
    • Arrays are expected (multiple images, multiple prices, multiple authors)
    • Downstream systems expect objects

    When CSV should be used

    CSV is usually preferred when:

    • A stable schema exists (same columns every time)
    • Data will be filtered and reviewed in spreadsheets
    • A quick export is more important than perfect expressiveness

    For readability-first outputs, Markdown is often used, as covered in Markdown vs CSV.

    Practical tradeoffs

    CSV forces decisions early

    If arrays or nested objects exist, flattening rules must be invented (join with ;, create repeated columns, or explode rows). Those rules can be correct, but they must be maintained.

    JSON makes "optional" fields easy

    Fields can be omitted or set to null. That flexibility works well for scraped pages where data is inconsistent.

    Node.js snippet: Flatten JSON records for CSV export

    A simple flattening approach is shown: nested values are serialized as JSON strings. That is not pretty, but it is predictable.

    // Node 18+
    // Convert an array of JSON objects into a CSV with stable columns.
    
    import { readFile } from "node:fs/promises";
    
    const items = JSON.parse(await readFile("items.json", "utf8"));
    
    const keys = new Set();
    for (const item of items) for (const k of Object.keys(item)) keys.add(k);
    const headers = [...keys];
    
    function cell(v) {
      const s = typeof v === "string" ? v : JSON.stringify(v);
      return `"${String(s).replaceAll('"', '""')}"`;
    }
    
    const lines = [];
    lines.push(headers.join(","));
    for (const item of items) {
      lines.push(headers.map((h) => cell(item[h] ?? "")).join(","));
    }
    
    console.log(lines.slice(0, 5).join("\n"));
    

    Conclusion

    • JSON is usually preferred for nested data, metadata, and reliable ingestion.
    • CSV is usually preferred for flat datasets and spreadsheet-friendly exports.
    • In many scraping pipelines, JSON is used internally and CSV is generated only as an export.

    If human-edited configs are needed, YAML can be compared in YAML vs CSV.